ABSTRACT
Purpose: Consensual eye intra?ocular pressure (IOP) increase has been reported following ipsilateral glaucoma surgery. The study evaluated the need for increase in anti?glaucoma medications (AGM) ± glaucoma surgery to control the IOP in consensual eye following unilateral glaucoma surgery. Methods: Data of 187 consecutive patients who underwent either trabeculectomy or AGV implant were collected. Index (IE) and fellow eye (FE) IOP (baseline, follow?up day 1, week 1, months 1 and 3), acetazolamide and AGM use, FE surgery, glaucoma status, and relevant ophthalmological data were collected. Results: A significant increase from a baseline IOP of 14.4 mmHg was noted at week 1 (15.8 mmHg, p?0.005) and month 1 (15.62 mmHg, p?0.007) in FE (n?187). Among the 61 patients (33%, n?187) who needed additional intervention to reduce FE IOP, 27 (14.4%) underwent FE trabeculectomy. In the IE trabeculectomy group (n?164), significant increase in FE IOP was noted in week 1 (15.87 mmHg, p?0.014) and month 1 (15.61 mmHg, p?0.02), and in the IE AGV group (n?23) at day 1 (15.91 mmHg, p?0.06). Pre?operative acetazolamide resulted in significant increase in FE IOP at week 1 and month 1. Maximum increase in FE IOP of nearly 3.5 mm Hg was noted when IE IOP was persistently <5 mmHg at one month following surgery. Mean FE IOP remained elevated at all visits. Conclusion: An increase in fellow eye IOP needing any additional intervention in a third and surgical intervention in nearly a sixth meant that FE IOP be strictly monitored and addressed following unilateral glaucoma surgery
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study was conducted to examine microbiological profile with their antibiotic sensitivity in cases of bacterial keratitis in north and central India to ensure appropriate use of antibiotics. Methods: The microbiology laboratory records of 228 patients with culture?proven bacterial keratitis from 1st January to 31st December 2019 were analyzed. Cultured bacterial isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing to antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of corneal ulcer. Chi?squared or Fisher’s exact test were applied to check the significance of difference between the susceptibility levels of antibiotics. Results: The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa–induced keratitis was higher in northern India, whereas that by Streptococcus pneumoniae was more prevalent in central India. In central India, 100% of S. pneumoniae isolates were found to be sensitive to ceftriaxone compared to 79% in northern India (P = 0.017). In comparison to 67% of isolates from north India, 15% of S. aureus isolates from central India were found to be sensitive to ofloxacin (P = 0.009). Similarly, 23% of isolates from central India were found sensitive to amikacin compared to 65% of isolates from north India (P = 0.012). P. aeruginosa isolates from central India were found to be sensitive to ceftazidime in 63% of cases compared to 21% of isolates from north India (P = 0.034). Conclusion: Prevalence of bacteria and their susceptibility to antibiotics are not uniform across geography. Vancomycin remained the most effective drug in all gram?positive coccal infections. S. aureus susceptibility to amikacin was significantly greater in north India. P. aeruginosa showed less susceptibility as compared to previous reports.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the tertiary centers (TCS) and vision centers (VCs) of the four organizations participating in this research, once the lockdown was lifted, and to compare it with the performance during the same period of the previous year. Methods: This was a cross?sectional study assessing eyecare utilization in the first 2 months after resumption of services post the lockdown in 2020 and comparing that across the same time period in 2019. Anonymized data containing basic demographic details, proportions of patient visits and their reasons, as well as referral information was collected. The drop percentage method was used, and P values were calculated using paired t?tests. Results: Four TCs and 60 VCs were included. Overall, outpatient attendance dipped 51.2% at TCs and 27.5% at VCs, across the 2 years. At both levels of care delivery, the percentage drop in females was more than that in males; however, the overall drop at VCs was less than that at TCs, for both sexes. Eyecare utilization in pediatric populations dropped significantly more than in adult populations, across the overall sample. There was no significant change in referrals for refractive error as a proportion of total outpatients, although there was a significant decline in the same for cataract and specialty treatment. Conclusion: VCs are valuable and successful model for eyecare delivery especially in the continued aftermath of the COVID?19 pandemic
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: The evidence-base of the impact of community-based health insurance (CBHI) on access to healthcare and financial protection in India is weak. We investigated the impact of CBHI in rural Uttar Pradesh and Bihar States of India on insured households’ self-medication and financial position. Methods: Data originated from (i) household surveys, and (ii) the Management Information System of each CBHI. Study design was “staggered implementation” cluster randomized controlled trial with enrollment of one-third of the treatment group in each of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013. Around 40-50 per cent of the households that were offered to enroll joined. The benefits-packages covered outpatient care in all three locations and in-patient care in two locations. To overcome self-selection enrollment bias, we constructed comparable control and treatment groups using Kernel Propensity Score Matching (K-PSM). To quantify impact, both difference-in-difference (DiD), and conditional-DiD (combined K-PSM with DiD) were used to assess robustness of results. Results: Post-intervention (2013), self-medication was less practiced by insured HHs. Fewer insured households than uninsured households reported borrowing to finance care for non-hospitalization events. Being insured for two years also improved the HH’s location along the income distribution, namely insured HHs were more likely to experience income quintile-upgrade in one location, and less likely to experience a quintile-downgrade in two locations. Interpretation & conclusions: The realized benefits of insurance included better access to healthcare, reduced financial risks and improved economic mobility, suggesting that in our context health insurance creates welfare gains. These findings have implications for theoretical, ethical, policy and practice considerations.